|
Post by lloyd on Mar 17, 2007 21:32:43 GMT -5
These are thumbnails, click on them to see them in their full glory. Here's a flower of what I think is Ping. sp. pachuca (see replies, probably moranensis). I might get some seeds (no seeds this time, I was premature) from this.: Here's the N. "alata" I bought at Canada Blooms: Here's U. humboldtii, I know it looks horrible. It's only for Tom.:
|
|
|
Post by insectivore on Mar 18, 2007 11:02:48 GMT -5
Nice plants man! Cya
|
|
|
Post by mabudon on Mar 18, 2007 11:09:28 GMT -5
Yep, them N.alata plants that we saw at the local Orchid show must have been from the same place, them things are ALMOST stupid big eh??
Nice pics Lloyd!!
|
|
|
Post by tom on Mar 18, 2007 11:31:22 GMT -5
Thanks for the U. humboldtii! About your ping, I don't think it's a sp Pachuca... just a personal thought Oh! and if you could explain how to do thumbsnail on the forum, I know that Steve and I would be interested by this information
|
|
|
Post by martin on Mar 18, 2007 13:39:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by tom on Mar 18, 2007 14:38:44 GMT -5
I think i would more for a form or a variety of moranensis. Pachuca is usually more purplish in color than pinkish and has a 'narrower' profile...
|
|
|
Post by vraev on Mar 18, 2007 14:49:16 GMT -5
nice plants there dude. Yeah...the ceph looks cute. do u have a closer pic of it?
|
|
|
Post by lloyd on Mar 18, 2007 22:02:52 GMT -5
Thanks for the comments. You're right, it looks more like a moranensis. I shall relabel it and change my growing list. All I can say is that I got some plants, mixed up the labels and thought that was the "pachuca". Probably the "pachuca" died and I got things mixed up. The "alata" pitchers are ridiculously large. They are dying back somewhat in my house probably due to the lower humidity. I'll see how they do, I don't want to have to enclose such a big plant. xs.to/codes.php?f=Ceph1.jpg&h=xs205&d=06355I use xs.to for my image hosting. It's really good for http newbies like me. It lists all the codes including a thumbnail one. I like the thumbnails as the pages load really quickly and people can pick and choose the ones they want to see in full size. Here's a ceph I posted in a different thread: By the way, there is some subulata in the ceph pot. Spot it and you will get the next stolon I find.
|
|
|
Post by tom on Mar 18, 2007 22:15:26 GMT -5
By the way, there is some subulata in the ceph pot. Spot it and you will get the next stolon I find. I found it, but i better keep my mouth shut lol
|
|
|
Post by vraev on Mar 18, 2007 23:02:14 GMT -5
WOW! the ceph is freaking amazing. .. I like it soo much. its soo interesting....the Iron Cross Begonia has that kind of hair on its leaves and stems too... it looks sooo cool.
|
|
|
Post by lloyd on Mar 19, 2007 13:03:23 GMT -5
I think I need some help with my Pings. Including the one at the top of the thread they are supposed to be: sp. Pachuca, agnata x (elhersiae x moranensis) and moranensis. Consensus seems to be that the top one is moranensis so what about the other two below? What is this: (See replies: these two pictures are from one plant, likely agnata x (elhersiae x moranensis)) and this: (Again see replies from Tom, maybe sp. Pachuca) I have no idea what this is, maybe a mutated U. subulata: By the way, that ceph picture was from late fall of 2006 and looked much better then (always better before the winter) and also they look much better in a macro close up than in actual view (even in my 1.3 megapixel Sony Cybershot).
|
|
|
Post by tom on Mar 19, 2007 13:33:02 GMT -5
The first one is the same you took in the precedent post? (dont think so since the petal and color scheme are different). If not, it's clearly Pinguicula agnata x (moranensis x ehlersiae) to me. I could post a picture of it if you need to compare
The second: the leaves thickness and arrangement reminds me my P. agnata, which never grew well for me btw
The third should be P. moranensis as its the only choice left haha. The rounded leaves, upturned margins remind me sp Pachuca though... Could post one picture of the flower too...
Is the last one the very rare Ontarian bearded sundew? Quite amazing to finally see a picture of it!
|
|
|
Post by lloyd on Mar 19, 2007 16:15:40 GMT -5
Sorry I should have been clearer. The very first ping picture (Ping #1) on this thread is probably moranensis, the second and third ping pictures are from one plant (Ping #2) and are probably agnata x (moranensis x ehlersiae) and the last picture (Ping #3) is likely sp Pachuca. I will post a picture of Ping #3 flower as soon as it appears. Thanks for the help.
I think Tom's identification of the last photo is also correct.
|
|
|
Post by insectivore on Mar 19, 2007 16:29:44 GMT -5
Nice plants Lloyd! Cya
|
|
|
Post by tom on Mar 19, 2007 17:13:23 GMT -5
here's a comparison with my plants as a reference (for ID purpose): Pinguicula sp. Pachuca (for ping #3) Pinguicula agnata x ( moranensis x ehlersiae) (for ping #1) Pinguicula moranensis var. caudata (in comparison of the very first ping you posted) I dont know if i have a photo of my old P. agnata rosette...
|
|