|
Post by carkin on Nov 5, 2016 13:24:54 GMT -5
One of my 'no name' pings bloomed. To my untrained eye, I would say it's moranensis. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by mexiping on Nov 19, 2016 12:52:56 GMT -5
Wow! I would have thought you'd have an answer by now. It's very pretty and I love the little pot you have it in. Adorable.
|
|
|
Post by carkin on Nov 19, 2016 14:53:15 GMT -5
Lol, I was wondering the same thing mexiping! I got thinking maybe it's so obvious to well seasoned ping growers, or maybe it's a hybrid. I don't know.
Thank you for your reply and compliments!! I appreciate it. ☺️
|
|
|
Post by kiwipete on Nov 19, 2016 16:53:11 GMT -5
One of my 'no name' pings bloomed. To my untrained eye, I would say it's moranensis. What do you think? Could it be one of the ‘Weser’ or ‘Sethos’ group ? KP.
|
|
|
Post by carkin on Nov 19, 2016 18:09:44 GMT -5
Hmmmm...I have 'Weser' and the leaves don't match, but I'm not sure about 'Sethos' as I don't have that one.
Is there any reason to think that it's not just a plain old moranensis? I have it in bright southern light and the leaves are just green (no pink at all), if that helps. I have a moranensis from Hal that I'll be able to compare with, once it blooms for me. Thank you kiwipete!
|
|
|
Post by kawarthapine on Nov 19, 2016 20:58:31 GMT -5
It looks like the moranensis flower to me, but I lost my plant about two years ago so I could be wrong.
It does not look like the Wesser I got from Cole.
|
|
|
Post by lloyd on Nov 19, 2016 21:57:19 GMT -5
The Moranensis group is heterogeneous. It does look Moranensis-like to me.
|
|
|
Post by carkin on Nov 22, 2016 13:13:59 GMT -5
I bought this one at the same time, and it's blooming for the first time too. I like how the petals are fuller on this one.
|
|